Top 30 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) only focused on the Monolithic Architecture Vulnerabilities in the context of web Application security covering below topics,along with their answers and explanations.
• Identifying vulnerabilities specific to monolithic architectures.
• Discussing the risks associated with a single, tightly coupled application structure.
PRACTICE IT NOW TO SHARPEN YOUR CONCEPT AND KNOWLEDGE
1. What is a key characteristic of monolithic architecture in web applications?
- Loose coupling of components
- Independence of services
- Single, tightly integrated unit
- Compressed application code
Monolithic architecture in web applications is characterized by a single, tightly integrated unit where all components are interconnected.
2. Why does monolithic architecture pose a potential security risk?
- It is inherently secure
- Tight integration increases the attack surface and impact of vulnerabilities
- Monolithic architectures have no vulnerabilities
- Compressed application code reduces security risks
Monolithic architecture poses a potential security risk because tight integration increases the attack surface and impact of vulnerabilities, making it challenging to isolate and contain issues.
3. What is a common vulnerability associated with monolithic architectures due to shared resources?
- Buffer overflow attacks
- Insecure direct object references
- Cross-site scripting (XSS)
- Compressing application code vulnerabilities
Insecure direct object references are a common vulnerability in monolithic architectures, often arising due to shared resources and a lack of proper access controls.
4. How does the lack of isolation in monolithic architectures contribute to security challenges?
- Lack of isolation enhances security
- It simplifies the identification of vulnerabilities
- Lack of isolation can lead to the spread of security issues across the entire system
- Compressed application code automatically isolates vulnerabilities
The lack of isolation in monolithic architectures can lead to the spread of security issues across the entire system, making it challenging to contain and address vulnerabilities.
5. What is the impact of a security breach in one component of a monolithic architecture on the entire application?
- The breach is limited to that specific component
- The breach has no impact on the overall application
- The entire application is affected due to tight integration
- Compressed application code automatically mitigates breaches
In monolithic architectures, a security breach in one component can impact the entire application due to the tight integration of components.
6. What type of attack is more likely to exploit vulnerabilities in shared memory spaces in monolithic architectures?
- SQL injection
- Cross-site scripting (XSS)
- Buffer overflow attacks
- Compressing application code attacks
Buffer overflow attacks are more likely to exploit vulnerabilities in shared memory spaces in monolithic architectures, taking advantage of the lack of isolation.
7. What is a challenge associated with securing communication between components in monolithic architectures?
- Communication is inherently secure
- Properly configuring secure communication protocols
- Compressing application code automatically secures communication
- Limited communication between components
A challenge associated with securing communication in monolithic architectures is properly configuring secure communication protocols between components.
8. What security principle is compromised when there is a lack of proper access controls in monolithic architectures?
- The principle of least privilege
- The principle of isolation
- Compressing application code securely
- The principle of unrestricted access
The lack of proper access controls in monolithic architectures compromises the security principle of least privilege, allowing users or components more access than necessary.
9. How can monolithic architectures be susceptible to Denial of Service (DoS) attacks?
- Monolithic architectures are immune to DoS attacks
- Due to their tight integration, a single point of failure can affect the entire system
- Compressing application code effectively mitigates DoS attacks
- By limiting access to external services
Monolithic architectures can be susceptible to DoS attacks because, due to their tight integration, a single point of failure can affect the entire system, leading to service disruptions.
10. What is a common consequence of not regularly updating dependencies in monolithic architectures?
- Improved security
- Enhanced performance
- Exposure to known vulnerabilities
- Compressing application code eliminates dependency issues
Not regularly updating dependencies in monolithic architectures can expose the system to known vulnerabilities, as security patches and updates are not applied.
11. Why can it be challenging to scale monolithic applications horizontally for increased load handling?
- Monolithic applications are inherently scalable
- Horizontal scaling requires too many resources
- Due to the tight coupling of components, it may necessitate scaling the entire application
- Compressing application code simplifies horizontal scaling
Scaling monolithic applications horizontally can be challenging because, due to the tight coupling of components, it may necessitate scaling the entire application rather than specific components.
12. What is a risk associated with using outdated technology stacks in monolithic architectures?
- Outdated technology stacks have no impact on security
- Improved security
- Exposure to known vulnerabilities and lack of support
- Compressing application code automatically updates technology stacks
Using outdated technology stacks in monolithic architectures poses a risk as it may expose the system to known vulnerabilities, and lack of support can hinder the application's overall security.
13. How does the lack of component autonomy in monolithic architectures affect security?
- Component autonomy has no impact on security
- It simplifies security management
- Lack of autonomy makes it challenging to implement security measures specific to individual components
- Compressing application code automatically ensures autonomy
The lack of component autonomy in monolithic architectures makes it challenging to implement security measures specific to individual components, limiting customization and targeted security controls.
14. What is a potential drawback of not having granular logging and monitoring in monolithic architectures?
- Improved visibility into system activities
- Simplified incident response
- Difficulty in identifying and responding to security incidents
- Compressing application code eliminates the need for logging and monitoring
Not having granular logging and monitoring in monolithic architectures can make it difficult to identify and respond to security incidents, hindering incident response efforts.
15. Why can monolithic architectures be less resilient in the face of failures or crashes?
- Monolithic architectures are inherently resilient
- Tight integration increases the impact of failures across the entire system
- Compressing application code automatically improves resilience
- Limited impact of failures due to component isolation
Monolithic architectures can be less resilient because tight integration increases the impact of failures, affecting the entire system rather than isolated components.
16. How does the lack of flexibility in technology choices impact security in monolithic architectures?
- Limited flexibility has no impact on security
- It simplifies security measures
- Limited flexibility may hinder the adoption of more secure technologies
- Compressing application code automatically ensures flexibility in technology choices
The lack of flexibility in technology choices may hinder the adoption of more secure technologies in monolithic architectures, limiting the ability to address evolving security threats.
17. Why can centralized databases in monolithic architectures be a potential security risk?
- Centralized databases pose no security risk
- Enhanced data security
- A compromise in the database can lead to a significant security breach
- Compressing application code ensures database security
Centralized databases in monolithic architectures can be a potential security risk because a compromise in the database can lead to a significant security breach, impacting the entire system.
18. How does the lack of modularity in monolithic architectures impact security updates?
- Lack of modularity simplifies security updates
- Each component can be updated independently
- Security updates require updating the entire monolith, leading to potential disruptions
- Compressing application code eliminates the need for security updates
The lack of modularity in monolithic architectures can impact security updates as updating the entire monolith may be required, leading to potential disruptions and challenges.
19. Why can monolithic architectures be more susceptible to prolonged downtime during updates or maintenance?
- Monolithic architectures experience minimal downtime
- Due to the need to update the entire system during maintenance, leading to prolonged downtime
- Compressing application code eliminates downtime during updates
- Limited impact of updates on overall system availability
Monolithic architectures can be more susceptible to prolonged downtime during updates or maintenance because updating the entire system may be necessary, impacting availability.
20. What is a potential security risk associated with interdependencies between components in monolithic architectures?
- Interdependencies pose no security risk
- Improved security
- A failure in one component can lead to cascading failures across the system
- Compressing application code automatically manages interdependencies securely
Interdependencies between components in monolithic architectures can be a potential security risk as a failure in one component can lead to cascading failures across the entire system.
21. How does the lack of scalability options impact security in monolithic architectures?
- Lack of scalability options has no impact on security
- It simplifies security measures
- Difficulty in scaling specific components independently may affect performance and resilience
- Compressing application code ensures scalability in monolithic architectures
The lack of scalability options in monolithic architectures may impact security as difficulty in scaling specific components independently can affect performance and resilience.
22. What is a potential consequence of not implementing proper error handling in monolithic architectures?
- Improved system stability
- Enhanced security
- Increased vulnerability to attacks, including information disclosure
- Compressing application code automatically handles errors securely
Not implementing proper error handling in monolithic architectures can increase vulnerability to attacks, including information disclosure, as attackers may exploit unhandled errors.
23. Why can the lack of agility in development cycles impact security in monolithic architectures?
- Lack of agility has no impact on security
- It simplifies security measures
- Difficulty in quickly addressing security vulnerabilities and adapting to emerging threats
- Compressing application code ensures agility in development cycles
The lack of agility in development cycles can impact security in monolithic architectures, making it difficult to quickly address security vulnerabilities and adapt to emerging threats.
24. How does the absence of component boundaries impact security in monolithic architectures?
- Absence of boundaries enhances security
- It simplifies security measures
- Difficulty in isolating security incidents to specific components
- Compressing application code automatically establishes boundaries securely
The absence of component boundaries in monolithic architectures can impact security by making it difficult to isolate security incidents to specific components, leading to broader impacts.
25. What is a potential risk associated with not enforcing strong authentication measures in monolithic architectures?
- Improved user experience
- Enhanced security
- Increased susceptibility to unauthorized access and breaches
- Compressing application code ensures strong authentication measures
Not enforcing strong authentication measures in monolithic architectures can increase susceptibility to unauthorized access and breaches, compromising the overall security.
26. How can the lack of versioning and rollbacks impact security in monolithic architectures? (Continued)
- Lack of versioning and rollbacks has no impact on security
- Improved security
- Difficulty in managing and reverting changes, potentially leading to security issues
- Compressing application code automatically handles versioning and rollbacks securely
The lack of versioning and rollbacks in monolithic architectures can impact security by making it difficult to manage and revert changes, potentially leading to security issues if problematic changes are not quickly addressed.
27. Why can monolithic architectures be challenging to adapt to evolving security requirements and standards?
- Monolithic architectures easily adapt to evolving security requirements
- Tight integration may necessitate significant modifications to comply with new standards
- Compressing application code automatically ensures compliance with security standards
- Limited impact of security requirements on monolithic architectures
Monolithic architectures can be challenging to adapt to evolving security requirements and standards because tight integration may necessitate significant modifications to comply with new standards.
28. What is a potential consequence of not implementing secure session management in monolithic architectures?
- Improved user experience
- Enhanced security
- Increased susceptibility to session hijacking and unauthorized access
- Compressing application code automatically manages session security
Not implementing secure session management in monolithic architectures can increase susceptibility to session hijacking and unauthorized access, posing a security risk.
29. How can the lack of code maintainability impact security in monolithic architectures?
- Lack of maintainability has no impact on security
- It simplifies security measures
- Difficulty in addressing security vulnerabilities and applying patches in a timely manner
- Compressing application code automatically ensures maintainability and security
The lack of code maintainability in monolithic architectures can impact security by making it difficult to address security vulnerabilities and apply patches in a timely manner.
30. Why can monolithic architectures be more susceptible to prolonged recovery times after a security incident?
- Monolithic architectures have rapid recovery times
- Due to the need to recover the entire system, leading to prolonged recovery times
- Compressing application code automatically accelerates recovery after incidents
- Limited impact of security incidents on overall system recovery times
Monolithic architectures can be more susceptible to prolonged recovery times after a security incident because the need to recover the entire system may lead to extended recovery periods.
